Friday, October 12, 2012

Real Estate Roller Coaster - the past 4 years...

The folks at RealEstate.com calculated the following info, and made this interesting graphic.

This is what they add: "Here’s a little bit about our methodology: We calculated the total value of the housing market for three separate months – the peak (March of 2007), the trough (Nov of 2011) and the latest (June of 2012). We then calculated the theoretical value of the housing market during each of these periods, by multiplying the average price of a sold home by the estimated number of housing units, using numbers supplied by the U.S. Census Bureau."

This is looking at averages throughout the nation.   Each area is different, and in particular our area would not fit in this mold.  Nonetheless, this gives some interesting perspective.


real estate recovery

Francis

Current Mortgage rates

Non-profit organization worth noting: Partners for New Generations.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Shortage of California homes up for sale...

Shortage of California homes up for sale

For those who like to read technical stuff, this is perfect.  This goes into the nitty-gritty of the real estate market in California:
After years of having too many homes and not enough buyers, real estate agents in California now have the opposite problem – too many buyers and not enough homes for sale.


Let's look at the details:

* The CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) reported Monday (9/17) that its statewide inventory of unsold homes index for existing, single-family detached homes fell to 3.2 months in August from 3.5 months in July and 5.2 months in August 2011.

* The index reflects the number of months needed to sell the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate. A six- to seven-month supply is considered normal. When the number goes higher, inventory is plentiful and it’s considered a buyer’s market. When the number goes lower, the advantage goes to the seller.

* Declining inventory helps explain why the statewide median price of an existing, single-family detached home rose to $343,820 in August, up 3 percent from July and up 15.5 percent from August 2011, according to C.A.R.

* Nationwide, the inventory of homes for sale also has declined. In July, there was a 6.4-month supply of homes compared with 9.3 months in July 2011. The current number is in line with the long-term average, according to the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. However, NAR also acknowledges there are “acute shortages” in places such as California, Arizona, Nevada, and parts of Florida.

* Also constraining supply is the fact that so many homeowners are underwater – or owe more than their homes are worth – and unable to sell without taking a loss. As prices rise, more homes will increase in value, but it’s going to take time. Meanwhile, there are still a lot of homes that are not likely to come onto the market.

* At some point, the balance will tip, but it’s hard to predict when. When banks decide prices are high enough, they will start unloading houses they have been sitting on, according to the chief economist for Trulia.

Read the San Francisco Article on the matter for more details.
Thank you for reading!

Francis

A non-profit worth of praise: Habitat for Humanity


Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Homeownership cheaper than renting nationally


To piggy-back on my last blog, this is another take on the subject, which fascinates me, in this area where most real estate seems so expensive for a lot of people.

Trulia’s Summer 2012 Rent vs. Buy Report, which provides information on whether buying a home is more affordable than renting in America’s 100 largest metropolitan areas, found that homeownership is cheaper than renting in all of the 100 largest U.S. metros by a wide margin.

However, relative affordability depends largely on location. Buying a home is 24 percent cheaper than renting in Honolulu, 28 percent cheaper in San Francisco, and 31 percent cheaper in New York, but is 70 percent cheaper in Detroit. However, the actual dollar amount reveals that despite a low 28 percent difference in buying versus renting in San Francisco, the monthly dollar savings is big ($899) because rents and prices are so high in this region.

Note: Cost of homeownership assumes that the home is sold after seven years and includes closing costs, maintenance, insurance, property taxes and other costs. Cost of renting includes security deposit and renters insurance. Monthly costs are based on net present value of costs averaged over seven years, and based on the average across all properties listed in the metro area, including those for sale and those for rent, in summer 2012.

More info on this article from Trulia.

Thanks for reading, your comments are always welcome!
Francis
useful links

A noteworthy web site: junk mail reducer: Catalog Choice

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Renting vs buying... an age-old quandary.

In 75% of the US one gets ahead within 3 years by buying a home vs continuing to rent.

Typically, and historically, it was kind of understood that it takes about 3 years to see the advantages of owning instead of renting.  The first years, most often, it seems a lot more expensive, and you do not see yet the tax advantage, when there is one. Then you settle in and start feeling "at home" vs leasing you space in life, and that adds to the financial aspects of the question.

But now that prices have moved a lot and in different ways throughout the US, it is not so straightforward.  In short, where prices have fallen the most would be where it is most attractive to buy, vs to rent.

This study from Zillow gives more detailed information on the new quirks and wrinkles of this age-old quandary.

Francis

useful links

Current Mortgage rates

Monday, September 10, 2012

Property tax increase.

Property taxes, as levied by the Counties, cannot go up more than 2% per year, right?
Well, not really.  It is true that Proposition 13 capped the increase of property values at 2% per year, but there is another Proposition, - Proposition 8,  which passed the same year as Proposition 13, which allows the property value to go down if the market tanks.

When the market goes back up, though, that same Proposition allows then the reassessment of the properties by the County to go back up by more than 2%, until it reaches the value that it would have been if it had not gone down in the first place.


A little hard to follow?  Just imagine what would be the potential value of your property, after you bought it, if it had increased by 2% per year (assuming the market was going up).  This is the value that it could be reassessed by the County if the market does go back to that value...

The request for re-evaluation of an assessment by the County can be done electronically now through their revamped web site, which provides easier ways to search for comparables and maps.
Santa Clara County assessor's web site.
and: contesting your assessed value.

If you wish, I can also assist you by providing a study of the recent sales through the MLS - which has saved quite a bit of money to some of my clients in the past few years.

Francis

useful links

Rates are super low right now! Mortgage rates

Like art?  Participate in the art auction of the Coalition on Homelessness.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Local ratio: sales price / list price.

For the 3 Cities of Palo Alto, Los Altos and Mountain View combined, this is what the ratio of the sales price over listing price looks like, for all houses listed after the 1st of the year 2012.
This graph shows this interesting ratio sliced by list price range.

Mountain View + Los Altos + Palo Alto

One of the interesting bars is the one for prices over $5 million:  -- the luxury market has definitely picked up from the past 3 years.

In the price range of $200k to $400k, this is for a (unique) house that, after a price reduction, was listed at $390,000 and finally sold at $335,199 in Mountain View, along 101.
Curious about your specific neighborhood? Let me know!

Thanks for reading!
Francis


useful links
Rates are super low right now! Mortgage rates

Monday, July 30, 2012

Californians on the move.

When Californians move, where do they go?

It turns out that when a Californian moves, he/she mostly stays in the same County (49%).
So most likely, when people move they just want to move up or move down.

4 years ago, a lot more people were going to an other state; possibly to deal more easily with the crisis, as the cost of living is so high here?  Once that wave happened, it seems that out-of-state moves settled around 20% of the movers.

Consistently, about 1% of the movers go outside of the US.  Funny to note that in 2009, at the worst time for real estate values, twice as many people left to go outside of the US.

Want to receive my posts regularly?  "Like" my facebook page:

Thanks for reading,
Francis
useful links

Current Mortgage rates

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Rents increase, more than home prices.

Rent increases outpace modest home price rises (nationwide)...

Despite widespread national asking price rises, rent increases outpaced price increases in 22 of the 25 largest rental markets, according to the Trulia Rent Monitor. Nationally, rents were 5.4-percent higher in June than they were a year ago, and rents increased year-over-year in 24 of the 25 largest rental markets – all except Las Vegas. Furthermore, rent increases accelerated between March and June in most rental markets, with rents in San Francisco rising 14.7 percent year-over-year in June from 10.9 percent in March.
I was noting in one of my May's blogs that rents were up 9.4% in San Jose.

Home price rises are not so modest, by the way, locally (- but then, ditto for rent increases).

More info on this Trulia press release.

As always, thanks for reading,
Francis

Current Mortgage rates